11/8/2022 0 Comments Superior drummer 3 latency![]() You can check your own with the program if you're running a PC. A program called MIDItest shows the disaster of MIDI latency. I think the weakest point is not MIDI itself (a MIDI note takes just a bit more than a millisecond to transfer – see ddrum4!) but the way modern firewire interfaces handle MIDI. #Superior drummer 3 latency software#Triggering drum software on a PC is still horrible. So there's still going on some smart computing while holding up the speed (still faster than present expensive modules from Roland). I might check it as well.Įven the Simmons ADT is quiet fast considering it's almost 20 years old! It even samples the triggering signal envelopes to limit/exclude crosstalk of different triggering types (acoustic drums, pads, tape source, etc.). I didn't have a ddrum3 at that time but I assume it's as fast as the ddrum4. Triggering the ddrum4 itself via MIDI does not take longer as triggering a Roland TD-12 directly without MIDI. I've found it quite remarkable that the ddrum4 is still quiet fast over MIDI. Roland TD-12 triggering ddrum4 via MIDI and vice versaīFD software drums on PC with Terratec Phase X24 audio/MIDI interface The different start points represent the overall latency from pad strike to audio out of the tested drum module.ĭdrum4 triggering itslf via MIDI (MIDI out wired directly to MIDI in) Opening the recording in an audio editor I could see the start point of the trigger signal and the shifted start point of the triggered audio signal from the drum module. On the other channel I've recorded the audio signal from the drum module. So the piezo signal from the pad is recorded on one channel on the PC. ![]() ![]() The other one straight into the audio-in of the PC audio interface. I wanted to see how the different systems compare. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |